On Water

Link: http://www.mlive.com/news/annarbornews/index.ssf?/base/news-31/1233243703179280.xml&coll=2

The possible removal of Argo Dam on the Huron River in Ann Arbor generated some contentious debate Wednesday night at a meeting where about 150 people turned out to learn more about proposals for modifying the river.

Members of the local rowing community were particularly outspoken during breakout sessions when participants discussed the various consequences of removing, partially removing or keeping the dam.

Some said Argo is the best place for rowing - estimates range upward of 600 people participating along that stretch of the Huron - and that the growing popularity of the sport warrants more options, not fewer, along the river.

"This is our football field, our playing field,'' said Frank Rampton of Ann Arbor. "It's the only place in Ann Arbor where (rowers) have to row.''

But some who attended the meeting, held at Forsythe Middle School, complained about noise from rowers' practices, or said people were not considering other reasons for removing the dam. Others questioned whether changes would be worth the projected high costs.

The issue of removing the dam arose several years ago as the city grappled with how to deal with aging dams, increased sedimentation and resulting vegetation in the river's ponds through town.

Argo Dam's removal has been advocated by the local Huron River Watershed Council, and by the state Department of Natural Resources.

Some area residents have advocated for a whitewater course through the area below the dam; in a hybrid scenario, both could be possible, city officials say.

Argo Dam is one of four owned by the city. Originally built to produce hydropower, it was decommissioned, later rebuilt and now functions largely to provide a footpath across the river and create the 92-acre Argo Pond.

More meetings on the issue are planned: This Saturday from 9 a.m. to noon and Feb. 5 from 7 p.m. to 10 p.m., both at Forsythe Middle School, 1655 Newport Road in Ann Arbor.