<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?><!-- generator="b2evolution/2.4.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title>shimenawa - Latest comments on An index is data too</title>
		<link>http://blogs.lib.berkeley.edu/shimenawa.php?disp=comments</link>
		<description></description>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
		<admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://b2evolution.net/?v=2.4.2"/>
		<ttl>60</ttl>
				<item>
			<title>In response to: An index is data too</title>
			<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 03:51:01 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Joseph J. Esposito [Visitor]</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">c75271@http://blogs.lib.berkeley.edu/</guid>
			<description>This is a very interesting post.  I have a question about one aspect of it, the idea that the amount of information is growing at a rate that eclipses our ability to index it. Does this phenomenon have a name?  I have casually referred to it as &quot;the Tristram Shandy effect,&quot; after the 18th-century novel by Laurence Sterne.  Sterne/Shandy discovered that it was taking him longer to write his autobiography than it took to live his life.</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[This is a very interesting post.  I have a question about one aspect of it, the idea that the amount of information is growing at a rate that eclipses our ability to index it. Does this phenomenon have a name?  I have casually referred to it as "the Tristram Shandy effect," after the 18th-century novel by Laurence Sterne.  Sterne/Shandy discovered that it was taking him longer to write his autobiography than it took to live his life.]]></content:encoded>
			<link>http://blogs.lib.berkeley.edu/shimenawa.php/2008/12/24/an-index-is-data-too#c75271</link>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title>In response to: An index is data too</title>
			<pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2008 19:13:55 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Jonathan Rochkind [Visitor]</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">c75270@http://blogs.lib.berkeley.edu/</guid>
			<description>Agreed. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I had a thought a while ago that 'metadata' is just perspective on 'data', not a quality of the data itself.  Or, to put it another way, 'Metadata' vs 'data' are contingent (contextual, based on your perspective) not existential (inherent in the thing itself) categories.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One person's data is another person's metadata, and vice versa. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most people disagree with me when I bring it up, but the more I think about it and the more things develop, the more true it seems. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Agreed. <br />
<br />
I had a thought a while ago that 'metadata' is just perspective on 'data', not a quality of the data itself.  Or, to put it another way, 'Metadata' vs 'data' are contingent (contextual, based on your perspective) not existential (inherent in the thing itself) categories.  <br />
<br />
One person's data is another person's metadata, and vice versa. <br />
<br />
Most people disagree with me when I bring it up, but the more I think about it and the more things develop, the more true it seems. <br />
<br />]]></content:encoded>
			<link>http://blogs.lib.berkeley.edu/shimenawa.php/2008/12/24/an-index-is-data-too#c75270</link>
		</item>
			</channel>
</rss>
