<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?><!-- generator="b2evolution/2.4.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title>New Directions Initiative - Latest comments on Betsy Wilson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.lib.berkeley.edu/newdirections.php?disp=comments</link>
		<description></description>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
		<admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://b2evolution.net/?v=2.4.2"/>
		<ttl>60</ttl>
				<item>
			<title>In response to: Betsy Wilson</title>
			<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 20:32:56 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Dori Hsiao [Visitor]</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">c9577@http://blogs.lib.berkeley.edu/</guid>
			<description>Karen, &lt;br /&gt;
Thanks for your thoughtful reflections on the talk. I especially appreciated the &quot;looking outside ourselves&quot; perspective. &lt;br /&gt;
But to indulge in a bit more navel-gazing, I do want to comment on &lt;blockquote&gt;I no longer feel that there is any particularly assured future for academic libraries, the book, or professional librarians.&lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;br /&gt;
I am actually quite optimistic and excited about the profession. I believe there will continue to be a need for &quot;librarians&quot; as mediators/navigators/experts to help users access quality information. Having said that, and echoing your comments on survival, if librarianship doesn't prove itself adaptable, especially in a technology-based environment, it dooms itself. New directions, yes!&lt;br /&gt;
It seems to me that in order to support adaptation, in order to not only survive but thrive, we have to provide a teaching library not only to our users, but to ourselves.</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Karen, <br />
Thanks for your thoughtful reflections on the talk. I especially appreciated the "looking outside ourselves" perspective. <br />
But to indulge in a bit more navel-gazing, I do want to comment on <blockquote>I no longer feel that there is any particularly assured future for academic libraries, the book, or professional librarians.</blockquote> <br />
I am actually quite optimistic and excited about the profession. I believe there will continue to be a need for "librarians" as mediators/navigators/experts to help users access quality information. Having said that, and echoing your comments on survival, if librarianship doesn't prove itself adaptable, especially in a technology-based environment, it dooms itself. New directions, yes!<br />
It seems to me that in order to support adaptation, in order to not only survive but thrive, we have to provide a teaching library not only to our users, but to ourselves.]]></content:encoded>
			<link>http://blogs.lib.berkeley.edu/newdirections.php/2007/10/16/betsy_wilson#c9577</link>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title>In response to: Betsy Wilson</title>
			<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 18:26:23 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>gford [Member]</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">c4337@http://blogs.lib.berkeley.edu/</guid>
			<description>Karen, thanks! for your great notes from the meeting. They are very comprehensive, readable, valuable.</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Karen, thanks! for your great notes from the meeting. They are very comprehensive, readable, valuable.]]></content:encoded>
			<link>http://blogs.lib.berkeley.edu/newdirections.php/2007/10/16/betsy_wilson#c4337</link>
		</item>
			</channel>
</rss>
